🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."