🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or deny as they see fit. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have practically abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by referring to last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you likely cannot draw the line at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs opposing mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and died to secure our freedoms. We may eventually regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.